Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284527›Full record

ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2022

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI radiomic features for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Yingfan Mao, Jincheng Wang, Yong Zhu, Jun Chen, Liang Mao, Weiwei Kong, Yudong Qiu, Xiaoyan Wu, Yue Guan, Jian He

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prediction of Histopathological Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yingfan Mao *Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Jincheng Wang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Drum Tower Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yong ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Jun ChenDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Liang MaoDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Weiwei KongDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Yudong QiuDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Xiaoyan WuDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Yue GuanSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jian HeDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prediction models for the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unsatisfactory. The purpose of this study is to develop preoperative models to predict histological grade of HCC based on gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics. And to compare the performance between artificial neural network (ANN) and logistic regression model. Methods: A total of 122 HCCs were randomly assigned to the training set (n=85) and the test set (n=37). There were 242 radiomic features extracted from volumetric of interest (VOI) of arterial and hepatobiliary phases images. The radiomic features and clinical parameters [gender, age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST)] were selected by permutation test and decision tree. ANN of arterial phase (ANN-AP), logistic regression model of arterial phase (LR-AP), ANN of hepatobiliary phase (ANN-HBP), logistic regression mode of hepatobiliary phase (LR-HBP), ANN of combined arterial and hepatobiliary phases (ANN-AP + HBP), and logistic regression model of combined arterial and hepatobiliary phases (LR-AP + HBP) were built to predict HCC histological grade. Those prediction models were assessed and compared. Results: ANN-AP and LR-AP were composed by AST and radiomic features based on arterial phase. ANN-HBP and LR-HBP were composed by AFP and radiomic features based on hepatobiliary phase. ANN-AP + HBP and LR-AP + HBP were composed by AST and radiomic features based on arterial and hepatobiliary phases. The prediction models could distinguish between high-grade tumors [Edmondson-Steiner (E-S) grade III and IV] and low-grade tumors (E-S grade I and II) in both training set and test set. In the test set, the AUCs of ANN-AP, LR-AP, ANN-HBP, LR-HBP, ANN-AP + HBP and LR-AP + HBP were 0.889, 0.777, 0.941, 0.819, 0.944 and 0.792 respectively. The ANN-HBP was significantly superior to LR-HBP (P=0.001). And the ANN-AP + HBP was significantly superior to LR-AP + HBP (P=0.007). Conclusions: Prediction models consisting of clinical parameters and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI radiomic features (based on arterial phase, hepatobiliary phase, and combined arterial and hepatobiliary phases) could distinguish between high-grade HCCs and low-grade HCCs. And the ANN was superior to logistic regression model in predicting histological grade of HCC.

Indexed as

hepatobiliary phaseHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)histological grademagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)radiomics

Identifiers

PMID35284527
PMCPMC8847875
OpenAlexW3036280617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.