Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284487›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer in the Treatment of Elderly Colorectal Cancer and Its Effect on Gastrointestinal Function.

Biao Liu, Chuanhui Yao, Haiying Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Two-portWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Laparoscopic Radical Resection versus Routine Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Biao LiuThe Third Department of Surgery, Cangxian Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Chuanhui YaoThe First Department of Surgery, Cangxian Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Haiying LiDepartment of Medical Affairs, Cangxian Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Cixian People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer in the elderly patients and its impact on gastrointestinal function. Methods: A total of 122 elderly patients with colorectal cancer admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to June 2021 were selected as the research subjects, and they were divided into the control group ( Results: The total response rate of the observation group (95.08%) was higher than that of the control group (81.97%) ( Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer in the elderly patients has good effect, short operation time, less trauma, less blood loss during operation, short hospital stay, good recovery of gastrointestinal function, fewer complications, and high safety.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerefficacygastrointestinal tract functionlaparoscopicsafety

Identifiers

PMID35284487
PMCPMC8907596
OpenAlexW4213455581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.