Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284460›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2022

Neonatal Feeding Tube Colonization and the Potential Effect on Infant Health: A Review.

Leslie A Parker, Marina Magalhães, Katelyn Desorcy-Scherer, Monica Torrez Lamberti, Graciela L Lorca, Josef Neu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. UnveilingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MAPLE Processed Nanostructures for Antimicrobial Coatings.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leslie A ParkerDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Marina MagalhãesDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Katelyn Desorcy-SchererDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Monica Torrez LambertiDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, Genetics Institute, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Graciela L LorcaDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, Genetics Institute, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Josef NeuDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) often require feeding tubes (FT) for weeks to months. Because FTs are in near constant contact with human milk and/or formula, rapid and extensive bacterial growth is possible. Due to their immature immunologic and gastrointestinal (GI) systems, infants may be at significant health risk due to FT colonization. In adults, length of time FTs remain in place (dwell time) affects the degree of colonization and biofilm formation which is important in infants whose tubes remain in place up to 30 days. Objective: The purpose of this review was to describe and summarize the evidence regarding FT bacterial colonization in infants and identify gaps needing further investigation. Methods: Medline, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched for clinical and/or laboratory-based observational and randomized controlled studies investigating the presence of bacteria in neonatal FTs. Results: This review of 10 studies found evidence that neonatal FTs may contain high quantities of potentially pathogenic and antibiotic resistant bacteria and longer dwell times may increase the bacterial load. Furthermore, evidence suggests FT colonization may be nosocomial in origin and contribute to adverse infant health. Feeding tubes are an unrecognized source of bacterial colonization which may increase morbidity in premature infants and thus the presence of bacteria in FTs is an important area of investigation in the nutritional care of vulnerable infants in the NICU. Implications: Further appropriately powered studies which are clinically based, use appropriate analyses, and control for potential covariates are necessary to make clinical recommendations.

Indexed as

colonizationcontaminationdwell timeenteral feedingfeeding tubeinfantinfection riskneonatal intensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID35284460
PMCPMC8908000
OpenAlexW4214512200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.