Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284390›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Advance Directives: Knowledge of the Topic Among Psychiatrists.

Vania Novelli Domingues, Luísa Castro, Monica Domingues Monteiro, José Antonio Cordero da Silva, Francisca Rego, Guilhermina Rego

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vania Novelli DominguesFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Luísa CastroFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Monica Domingues MonteiroFaculty of Engineering, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
José Antonio Cordero da SilvaFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Francisca RegoFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Guilhermina RegoFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Advance directives are becoming increasingly important as health technologies evolve. We sought to assess psychiatrists' knowledge of advance directives, as this knowledge is fundamental to the implementation and drafting of these personal documents. Methods: A previously published questionnaire that evaluated the knowledge of medical professors was used. The sample, composed of psychiatrists from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, originated from a publicly available list. During the search process, the COVID-19 pandemic affected Brazil and the rest of the world, which influenced our methodology and results. Results: A total of 40 psychiatrists participated in the study. The results obtained, although not significant, suggested that psychiatrists with an increased time of practice had more knowledge of advance directives. Nevertheless, less than half of the participants had knowledge about this topic. Conclusion: The number of psychiatrists surveyed indicates the need for further studies on the subject. The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on this study led to findings such as a change in sensitivity when addressing the topic and greater difficulty in contacting professionals.

Indexed as

COVID-19PsychiatryAdvance DirectivesBrazilHumansPandemicsadvance directivepandemicspatient autonomypsychiatryterminal diseasetherapeutic obstinacy

Identifiers

PMID35284390
PMCPMC8904751
OpenAlexW4214534022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.