ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Establishing a Macrophage Phenotypic Switch-Associated Signature-Based Risk Model for Predicting the Prognoses of Lung Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A diagnostic signature derived from NK cell related genes in prostate cancer: insights from integrated scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq analyses with functional validation of KIT.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A review of enhanced biosignature immunotherapy tools for predicting lung cancer immune phenotypes using deep learning.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Identification of pyroptosis-associated genes with diagnostic value in calcific aortic valve disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Screening and identifying a novel M-MDSCs-related gene signature for predicting prognostic risk and immunotherapeutic responses in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tumor-associated macrophages are important components of the tumor microenvironment, and the macrophage phenotypic switch has been shown to correlate with tumor development. However, the use of a macrophage phenotypic switch-related gene (MRG)-based prognosis signature for lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) has not yet been investigated. Methods: In total, 1,114 LADC cases from two different databases were collected. The samples from TCGA were used as the training set (N = 490), whereas two independent datasets (GSE31210 and GSE72094) from the GEO database were used as the validation sets (N = 624). A robust MRG signature that predicted clinical outcomes of LADC patients was identified through multivariate COX and Lasso regression analysis. Gene set enrichment analysis was applied to analyze molecular pathways associated with the MRG signature. Moreover, the fractions of 22 immune cells were estimated using CIBERSORT algorithm. Results: An eight MRG-based signature comprising CTSL, ECT2, HCFC2, HNRNPK, LRIG1, OSBPL5, P4HA1, and TUBA4A was used to estimate the LADC patients' overall survival. The MRG model was capable of distinguishing high-risk patients from low-risk patients and accurately predict survival in both the training and validation cohorts. Subsequently, the eight MRG-based signature and other features were used to construct a nomogram to better predict the survival of LADC patients. Calibration plots and decision curve analysis exhibited good consistency between the nomogram predictions and actual observation. ROC curves displayed that the signature had good robustness to predict LADC patients' prognostic outcome. Conclusions: We identified a phenotypic switch-related signature for predicting the survival of patients with LADC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.