Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284288›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Value of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound with clinical indicators in the prediction of bone metastasis in prostate cancer.

Hua Hong, Danyan Liang, Qian Liu, Guozhu Wu, Ran Sun, Juzhen Liu, Feng Wang, Fang Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hua Hong *Department of Ultrasonography, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Danyan Liang *Department of Ultrasonography, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Qian LiuDepartment of Ultrasonography, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Guozhu WuDepartment of Ultrasonography, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Ran SunDepartment of Ultrasonography, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Juzhen LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Feng WangDepartment of Pathology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Fang WangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound is an examination that can be used to diagnose and characterize prostate cancer by displaying tissue blood perfusion. To explore the value of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with clinical factors in predicting prostate cancer bone metastasis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination data, imaging examination data [single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT), CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or bone scan], clinical laboratory data, and pathological Gleason score of 163 patients with prostate cancer. They were randomly divided into the modeling and validation data sets. A model for predicting prostate cancer bone metastasis was established by logistic regression in the modeling data set. The differentiation, consistency, and benefits of the model were verified using the validation data set. A nomogram of the prediction model for bone metastasis of prostate cancer was drawn. Results: Among 163 patients with prostate cancer, 65 had bone metastasis. Total prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase, and the transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameter area under the curve were independently associated with prostate cancer bone metastasis, with OR values of 2.845, 2.839, and 1.004, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the prostate cancer bone metastasis prediction model was 0.804. In the training set, using a cutoff of 0.659, sensitivity was 52.8%, and specificity was 95.7%. In the validation set, using a cutoff of 0.659, sensitivity was 58.6%, and specificity was 98.1%. The area under the curve of the validation set was 0.799. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the calibration ability of the validation set was not statistically different from the training set (P=0.136). The decision curve analysis showed that the model had high benefits. Conclusions: The nomogram that includes the transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameter area under the curve and the clinical parameters total prostate-specific antigen, and alkaline phosphatase can be used to personalize the risk of prostate cancer bone metastases.

Indexed as

alkaline phosphatase (ALP)bone metastasisProstate cancer (PCa)total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA)transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound (TR-CEUS)

Identifiers

PMID35284288
PMCPMC8899971
OpenAlexW3214053919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.