Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284287›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Improved magnetic resonance myelin water imaging using multi-channel denoising convolutional neural networks (MCDnCNN).

Guojun Xu, Yongquan He, Qiurong Yu, Hongjian He, Zhiyong Zhao, Mingxia Fan, Jianqi Li, Dongrong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. REUSED: A deep neural network method for rapid whole-brain high-resolution myelin water fraction mapping from extremely under-sampled MRI.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guojun XuShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Yongquan HeShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Qiurong YuShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Hongjian HeCenter for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhiyong ZhaoKey Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Mingxia FanShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Jianqi LiShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Dongrong XuMolecular Imaging and Neuropathology Division, Columbia University Department of Psychiatry & New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Myelin water imaging (MWI) is powerful and important for studying and diagnosing neurological and psychiatric diseases. In particular, myelin water fraction (MWF) is derived from MWI data for quantifying myelination. However, MWF estimation is typically sensitive to noise. Improving the accuracy of MWF estimation based on WMI data acquired using a magnetic resonance (MR) multiple gradient recalled echo (mGRE) imaging sequence is desired. Methods: The proposed method employs a recently introduced the multi-channel denoising convolutional neural networks (MCDnCNN). Five different MCDnCNN models, denoted as Delevel1, Delevel2, Delevel3, Delevel4 and DelevelMix corresponding to five noise levels (Level1, Level2, Level3, Level4 and LevelMix), were trained using the data of the first echo of the mGRE brain images acquired from 15 healthy human subjects. Using simulated noisy data that employed a hollow cylinder model, we first evaluated the improvement in estimating MWF based on data denoised by the five different MCDnCNNs, by comparing the MWF maps calculated from the denoised data with ground truth. Next, we again evaluated the improvement using real-world Results: Experiments using the simulation data denoised by the appropriate MCDnCNN models showed that the standard deviation (SD) of the absolute error (AE) of the derived MWF results was significantly reduced (maximal reduction =15.5%, Level3 simulated noisy data, orientation angle =0, all the five MCDnCNN models). In the test using Conclusions: Appropriate MCDnCNN models as proposed may improve both the accuracy and precision in estimating MWF maps, thereby making it a more clinically feasible alternative.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)multi-channel denoising convolutional neural network (MCDnCNN) modelsmultiple gradient recalled echo (mGRE)Myelin water fraction (MWF)

Identifiers

PMID35284287
PMCPMC8899954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.