Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284277›Full record

ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

The use of deep learning technology for the detection of optic neuropathy.

Mei Li, Chao Wan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mei LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yanan People's Hospital, Yanan, China.
Chao WanDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of computer graphics processing units (GPUs), improvements in mathematical models, and the availability of big data, has allowed artificial intelligence (AI) to use machine learning and deep learning (DL) technology to achieve robust performance in various fields of medicine. The DL system provides improved capabilities, especially in image recognition and image processing. Recent progress in the sorting of AI data sets has stimulated great interest in the development of DL algorithms. Compared with subjective evaluation and other traditional methods, DL algorithms can identify diseases faster and more accurately in diagnostic tests. Medical imaging is of great significance in the clinical diagnosis and individualized treatment of ophthalmic diseases. Based on the morphological data sets of millions of data points, various image-related diagnostic techniques can now impart high-resolution information on anatomical and functional changes, thereby providing unprecedented insights in ophthalmic clinical practice. As ophthalmology relies heavily on imaging examinations, it is one of the first medical fields to apply DL algorithms in clinical practice. Such algorithms can assist in the analysis of large amounts of data acquired from the examination of auxiliary images. In recent years, rapid advancements in imaging technology have facilitated the application of DL in the automatic identification and classification of pathologies that are characteristic of ophthalmic diseases, thereby providing high quality diagnostic information. This paper reviews the origins, development, and application of DL technology. The technical and clinical problems associated with building DL systems to meet clinical needs and the potential challenges of clinical application are discussed, especially in relation to the field of optic nerve diseases.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)Deep learning (DL)fundus imageoptical coherence tomography (OCT)optic nerve

Identifiers

PMID35284277
PMCPMC8899937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.