ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Identifying
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- PET radiomics in lung cancer: advances and translational challenges.EJNMMI physics · 2024Review
- Identidication of novel biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Imaging with Methods: Using a gene expression profile consisting of 334 stage I-IIIA LUAD patients, prognostic-related gene coexpression modules were constructed via a weighted correlation network analysis algorithm. The robustness and prognostic performance of the coexpression modules were then tested across 2 gene expression datasets totaling 331 patients. Finally, using a discovery dataset with matched transcriptomic and Results: We selected a superior coexpression module for LUAD prognosis in which the genes were significantly enriched in important biological processes associated with tumors (e.g., cell cycle, DNA replication and p53 signaling pathway). The prognostic performance of the module for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was validated in 2 independent gene expression datasets (log-rank P<0.05). Through the leveraging of this prognostic coexpression module, a radiomic signature consisting of 3 PET features associated with metabolic processes was developed in the discovery dataset. The radiomic signature was significantly associated with patients' OS and RFS in an independent PET dataset consisting of 72 LUAD patients (OS: log-rank P=0.0006; RFS: log-rank P=0.0013). Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that the radiomic signature was an independent prognostic factor for OS and RFS. Furthermore, the novel proposed radiomic nomograms for OS and RFS had significantly better performance (concordance indices) than did the clinicopathological nomograms. Conclusions: The radiomic signature, which reflects biological processes in tumors (e.g., cell cycle and p53 signaling pathway), could noninvasively identify LUAD patients with poor prognosis who should receive postoperative adjuvant treatment. The signature is suitable for clinical application and could be robustly applied at an individual level across multicenter cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.