ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
A national dose analysis of guided tumor destruction: influence of sex, age, localization and destruction technique used.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous destructions of tumor lesions by ablation (microwave, radiofrequency or cryoablation) under computed tomography (CT) guidance allow high efficiency with minimally-invasive techniques, and acute needle placement and follow-up during procedure. This study investigated the impact of patient and technique parameters on the dose delivered during these procedures under CT guidance. Methods: Data were extracted from a previous nationwide retrospective study. Patients who underwent percutaneous destruction of bone lesions, abdominal and lung tumors were included. Univariate and multivariate linear regression of the dose length product (DLP) log were performed, according to patient's gender, age, lesion location, destruction technique, adjusted to the participating center. Results: A total of 822 patients (556 men), of mean age 62±14 years, were included: 150 patients had bone lesions, 463 abdominal and 209 thoracic tumors. The mean DLP was 991.6±979.0 mGy·cm for patients with bone lesions, 2,130.7±2,051.8 mGy∙cm for abdominal tumors and 825.2±545.4 mGy·cm for lung tumors. In multivariate analysis, the age was significantly associated with higher DLP for bone (P=0.0082) but not for abdominal and thoracic lesions; the DLP was significantly higher in men for abdominal tumors (P<0.0001) while sex had no impact on the dose for bone and thoracic lesions. The dose depended on the lesion location only for bone (P<0.0001) percutaneous destructions. The technique was not correlated to DLP for all lesions. Conclusions: Patient and tumor characteristics such as sex, age and lesion location impacted on the dose delivered during percutaneous destructions of bone, abdominal and thoracic lesions, but not the destruction technique used. Further studies are needed to propose sharper reference dose levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.