ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Superficial Temporal Vein and Alternative Middle Temporal Vein as Recipient Veins for Free-flap Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of Free Flaps in the Reconstruction of the Ventral Skull Base: A Systematic Literature Review.Head & neck · 2026Pooled it
- Microsurgical Reconstruction of the Ear and Temporal Region: Structural and Functional Considerations Including Hearing Rehabilitation-A Narrative Review.Audiology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The superficial and middle temporal veins (STV and MTV) have been used as recipient veins for free-flap reconstruction; however, the STV is sometimes small and cannot be used, while the MTV is not fully recognized or utilized as a recipient vein. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of the STV/MTV as recipient veins and to verify the utility and availability of the MTV by comparing the two veins. Thirty-five consecutive cases of free-flap reconstruction utilizing recipient vessels in the temporal region were retrospectively reviewed. Regarding recipient veins, the STV was the only option in the first 18 cases; the MTV was included among the options in the latter 17 cases. The calibers of the STV/MTV were evaluated at two level points (1: zygomatic arch, 2: palpebral fissure) using the results of preoperative dynamic-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Two cases of severe venous congestion were identified among the first 18 patients. After the adoption of the MTV, the MTV was used in 10 of the 17 cases, and no vascular complication occurred. On CT imaging evaluation, the caliber of the MTV (Point 2) (2.94 ± 0.55 mm) was significantly larger than the calibers of the STV (Point 1) (2.40 ± 0.48 mm) and MTV (Point 1) (2.49 ± 0.43 mm) (both
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.