ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2022
The predictive value of routine laboratory tests for colorectal polyps: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Association between serum lipids and colorectal polyps: a retrospective cross-sectional study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become the malignant tumor of the digestive tract with the highest incidence in our country, posing a serious threat to the health of our people. Early colon cancer is mostly due to the malignant transformation of colon polyps, so that early detection and resection have been shown to be effective in reducing the incidence and mortality of CRC. This study tried to investigate the related risk factors of and construct a predictive nomogram for colorectal polyps, providing meaningful guidance basis for risk stratification and screening. Methods: A total of 1,799 patients who underwent colonoscopies in the Health Management Centre of the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University were recruited to this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for colorectal polyps, and a predictive nomogram was constructed based on the multivariable model. We determined the predictive value of the nomogram by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses (DCAs). Results: The logistic regression analysis showed that age (P<0.001), gender (P<0.001), eosinophil count (P=0.005), hemoglobin level (P=0.039), and LDL-C/HDL-C ratio (LHR; P<0.001) were independent predictors of the development of colorectal polyps. The above independent risk factors were incorporated, and an individualized nomogram model was successfully established. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.679 in our model, and with the bootstrap method, the prediction curve fit well with the ideal curve, suggesting that the prediction curve constructed in this study has good predictive ability. Conclusions: Age, gender, eosinophil count, hemoglobin level, and LHR are risk factors for the development of colorectal polyps. Establishing a nomogram prediction model for colorectal polyps is helpful for the early clinical screening of high-risk patients with colorectal polyps, improving the detection rate of polyps and reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.