Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284033›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical devices2022

Mechanical Characterization and Validation of the Dynamic Collimation System Prototype for Proton Radiotherapy.

Theodore Geoghegan, Kaustubh Patwardhan, Nicholas Nelson, Patrick Hill, Ryan Flynn, Blake Smith, Daniel Hyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical devices, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Theodore GeogheganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA 52242.
Kaustubh PatwardhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA 52242.
Nicholas NelsonDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705.
Patrick HillDepartment of Human Oncology, School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, K4/B82, Madison, WI 53792.
Ryan FlynnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA 52242.
Blake SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA 52242.
Daniel HyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA 52242.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Sharpening the edge in pencil-beam proton therapy: an aftermarket collimation system to better spare normal tissue during radiation treatmentR37CA226518 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HYER, DANIEL ELLIS · 2018 to 2024
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA226518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy is integral to cancer treatments for more than half of patients. Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy is the latest radiation therapy technology that uses a beam of protons that are magnetically steered and delivered to the tumor. One of the limiting factors of PBS accuracy is the beam cross-sectional size, similar to how a painter is only as accurate as the size of their brush allows. To address this, collimators can be used to shape the beam along the tumor edge to minimize the dose spread outside of the tumor. Under development is a dynamic collimation system (DCS) that uses two pairs of nickel trimmers that collimate the beam at the tumor periphery, limiting dose from spilling into healthy tissue. Herein, we establish the dosimetric and mechanical acceptance criteria for the DCS based on a functioning prototype and Monte Carlo methods, characterize the mechanical accuracy of the prototype, and validate that the acceptance criteria are met. From Monte Carlo simulations, we found that the trimmers must be positioned within ±0.5 mm and ±1.0 deg for the dose distributions to pass our gamma analysis. We characterized the trimmer positioners at jerk values up to 400 m/s

Identifiers

PMID35284033
PMCPMC8905094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.