Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35283937›Full record

ArticleThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases2022

Comparative venomic profiles of three spiders of the genus

Frederico Francisco Fernandes, Juliana Rodrigues Moraes, Jaqueline Leal Dos Santos, Thiago Geraldo Soares, Vitor José Pinto Gouveia, Alessandra C S Matavel, William de Castro Borges, Marta do Nascimento Cordeiro, Suely Gomes Figueiredo, Márcia Helena Borges

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Venomics of the milos viper (Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frederico Francisco FernandesLaboratory of Proteomics and Arachnids, Research and Development Board, Ezequiel Dias Foundation, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Juliana Rodrigues MoraesLaboratory of Proteomics and Arachnids, Research and Development Board, Ezequiel Dias Foundation, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Jaqueline Leal Dos SantosLaboratory of Proteomics and Arachnids, Research and Development Board, Ezequiel Dias Foundation, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Thiago Geraldo SoaresLaboratory of Proteomics and Arachnids, Research and Development Board, Ezequiel Dias Foundation, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Vitor José Pinto GouveiaLaboratory of Proteomics and Arachnids, Research and Development Board, Ezequiel Dias Foundation, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Alessandra C S MatavelLaboratory of Biotechnology and Health, Research and Development Board, Ezequiel Dias Foundation, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
William de Castro BorgesLaboratory of Enzymology and Proteomics, Department of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil.
Marta do Nascimento CordeiroLaboratory of Proteomics and Arachnids, Research and Development Board, Ezequiel Dias Foundation, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Suely Gomes FigueiredoLaboratory of Protein Chemistry, Department of Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Márcia Helena BorgesLaboratory of Proteomics and Arachnids, Research and Development Board, Ezequiel Dias Foundation, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7848-5632
Ezequiel Dias Foundation · BRUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BRUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spider venoms induce different physio-pharmacological effects by binding with high affinity on molecular targets, therefore being of biotechnological interest. Some of these toxins, acting on different types of ion channels, have been identified in the venom of spiders of the genus Methods: Biochemical and functional comparison of the venoms were carried out by SDS-PAGE, HPLC, mass spectrometry, enzymatic activities and electrophysiological assays (whole-cell patch clamp). Results: The employed approach revealed that all three venoms had an overall similarity in their components, with only minor differences. The presence of a high number of similar proteins was evident, particularly toxins in the mass range of ~6.0 kDa. Hyaluronidase and proteolytic activities were detected in all venoms, in addition to isoforms of the toxins Tx1 and Tx2-6. All Tx1 isoforms blocked Nav1.6 ion currents, with slight differences. Conclusion: Our findings showed that Pn-V, Pe-V and Pp-V are highly similar concerning protein composition and enzymatic activities, containing isoforms of the same toxins sharing high sequence homology, with minor modifications. However, these structural and functional variations are very important for venom diversity. In addition, our findings will contribute to the comprehension of the molecular diversity of the venoms of the other species from

Indexed as

Ion channelsPhoneutriaProtein profileSpider venomToxins

Identifiers

PMID35283937
PMCPMC8875809
OpenAlexW4210852067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.