Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35283823›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Respiratory Mucosal Immunity: Kinetics of Secretory Immunoglobulin A in Sputum and Throat Swabs From COVID-19 Patients and Vaccine Recipients.

Cuiping Ren, Yong Gao, Cong Zhang, Chang Zhou, Ying Hong, Mingsheng Qu, Zhirong Zhao, Yinan Du, Li Yang, Boyu Liu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mucosal immune response in biology, disease prevention and treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Olfactory immune response to SARS-CoV-2.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cuiping RenDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yong GaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Second People's Hospital of Fuyang, Fuyang, China.
Cong ZhangDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Chang ZhouDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Ying HongMaanshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Maanshan, China.
Mingsheng QuDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Zhirong ZhaoMaanshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Maanshan, China.
Yinan DuDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Li YangDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Boyu LiuDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Siying WangDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Mingfeng HanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Second People's Hospital of Fuyang, Fuyang, China.
Yuxian ShenDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yan LiuDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Anhui Medical University · CNFuyang Second People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While IgM and IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively studied, relatively little is known about secretory IgA (sIgA) response in respiratory mucosa. Here we report IgA response to the SARS-CoV-2 in sputum, throat swabs, and serum with nucleocapsid protein (NP) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in a cohort of 28 COVID-19 patients and 55 vaccine recipients. The assays showed sIgA in respiratory mucosa could be detected on the first day after illness onset (AIO), and the median conversion time for sIgA in sputum, throat swabs, and serum was 3, 4, and 10 days, respectively. The positive rates of sIgA first week AIO were 100% (24/28) and 85.7% (24/28) in sputum and throat swabs, respectively, and were both 100% during the mid-onset (2-3 weeks AIO). During the recovery period, sIgA positive rates in sputum and throat swabs gradually decreased from 60.7% (17/28) and 57.1% (16/28) 1 month AIO and the sIgA antibodies were all undetectable 6 months AIO. However, serum IgA positive rate was still 100% at 4 months and 53.6% (15/28) at 6 months. Throat swabs obtained from volunteers who received inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines by intramuscular delivery all showed negative results in IgA ELISA. These findings will likely improve our understanding of respiratory mucosal immunity of this emerging disease and help in containing the pandemic and developing vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19IgAmucosal immunitynucleocapsid proteinsputumthroat swabvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35283823
PMCPMC8914317
OpenAlexW4214523362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.