ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Dishonest Signaling in Microbial Conflicts.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial Communication: The Possible Role of Quorum Sensing, Quantum Mechanics, and Quantum Tunneling.Metabolites · 2026Review
- Individual-based modeling unravels spatial and social interactions in bacterial communities.The ISME journal · 2025Review
- The territorial nature of aggression in biofilms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quorum sensing is a cell-cell communication system that bacteria use to express social phenotypes, such as the production of extracellular enzymes or toxins, at high cell densities when these phenotypes are most beneficial. However, many bacterial strains are known to lack a sensing mechanism for quorum signals, despite having the gene responsible for releasing the signals to the environment. The aim of this article is 2-fold. First, we utilize mathematical modeling and signaling theory to elucidate the advantage that a bacterial species can gain by releasing quorum signals, while not being able to sense them, in the context of ecological competition with a focal quorum sensing species, by reducing the focal species' ability to optimize the timing of expression of the quorum sensing regulated phenotype. Additionally, the consequences of such "dishonest signaling," signaling that has evolved to harm the signal's receiver, on the focal quorum sensing species are investigated. It is found that quorum sensing bacteria would have to incur an additional, strategic, signaling cost in order to not suffer a reduction in fitness against dishonest signaling strains. Also, the concept of the Least Expensive Reliable Signal is introduced and applied to study how the properties of the regulated phenotype affect the metabolic investment in signaling needed by the quorum sensing bacteria to withstand dishonest signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.