Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35283734›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2022

Deficient Recurrent Cortical Processing in Congenital Deafness.

Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf, Aly Lamuri, Peter Hubka, Jochen Tillein, Martin Vinck, Andrej Kral

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dynamic functional connectivity following cochlear implantation: Predicting speech outcomes and exploring brain network dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Crossmodal plasticity in hearing loss.Trends in neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Hearing and Cognition in Childhood.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Prasandhya Astagiri YusufDepartment of Medical Physics/Medical Technology IMERI, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Aly LamuriDepartment of Medical Physics/Medical Technology IMERI, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Peter HubkaInstitute of AudioNeuroTechnology and Department of Experimental Otology of the ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Jochen TilleinInstitute of AudioNeuroTechnology and Department of Experimental Otology of the ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Martin VinckErnst Strüngmann Institut for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Andrej KralInstitute of AudioNeuroTechnology and Department of Experimental Otology of the ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Indonesia · IDErnst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience · DEMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of sensory experience on cortical feedforward and feedback interactions has rarely been studied in the auditory cortex. Previous work has documented a dystrophic effect of deafness in deep cortical layers, and a reduction of interareal couplings between primary and secondary auditory areas in congenital deafness which was particularly pronounced in the top-down direction (from the secondary to the primary area). In the present study, we directly quantified the functional interaction between superficial (supragranular, I to III) and deep (infragranular, V and VI) layers of feline's primary auditory cortex A1, and also between superficial/deep layers of A1 and a secondary auditory cortex, namely the posterior auditory field (PAF). We compared adult hearing cats under acoustic stimulation and cochlear implant (CI) stimulation to adult congenitally deaf cats (CDC) under CI stimulation. Neuronal activity was recorded from auditory fields A1 and PAF simultaneously with two NeuroNexus electrode arrays. We quantified the spike field coherence (i.e., the statistical dependence of spike trains at one electrode with local field potentials on another electrode) using pairwise phase consistency (PPC). Both the magnitude as well as the preferred phase of synchronization was analyzed. The magnitude of PPC was significantly smaller in CDCs than in controls. Furthermore, controls showed no significant difference between the preferred phase of synchronization between supragranular and infragranular layers, both in acoustic and electric stimulation. In CDCs, however, there was a large difference in the preferred phase between supragranular and infragranular layers. These results demonstrate a loss of synchrony and for the first time directly document a functional decoupling of the interaction between supragranular and infragranular layers of the primary auditory cortex in congenital deafness. Since these are key for the influence of top-down to bottom-up computations, the results suggest a loss of recurrent cortical processing in congenital deafness and explain the outcomes of previous studies by deficits in intracolumnar microcircuitry.

Indexed as

auditory functioncongenital deafnesscortical columnelectrical recordingfunctional connectivityspike-field coherence

Identifiers

PMID35283734
PMCPMC8913535
OpenAlexW4214517145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.