Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35283681›Full record

ReviewThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2022

Revisiting Handwriting Fundamentals Through an Interdisciplinary Framework.

Ann Sien Sut Lee, Lay Wah Lee, Hui Min Low, Siew Chen Ooi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ann Sien Sut LeeSchool of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Lay Wah LeeSchool of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Hui Min LowSchool of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Siew Chen OoiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Penang General Hospital, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYHospital Pulau Pinang · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Handwriting research lies mostly within discipline-specific boundaries, hindering knowledge transfer across disciplines into academic skills instruction in schools. This paper attempts to review the literature on handwriting across the occupational therapy and education disciplines to propose an interdisciplinary conceptual framework to guide research and intervention on handwriting in the Malay language. This cross-disciplinary review revealed four major factors that may influence Malay language handwriting: i) neuromotor development; ii) ergonomic; iii) orthographic and iv) cognitive factors. The sub-factors under these four major factors also are identified. Many of the neuromotor development and ergonomic factors are derived from the occupational therapy discipline, while the education discipline provides most of the information on orthographic and cognitive factors. As orthography influences handwriting, it is necessary to revisit handwriting from the perspective of languages other than English. In conclusion, an interdisciplinary framework of handwriting synthesised from this cross-disciplinary review will stimulate more coordinated and coherent research on handwriting. The Malay language serves as a future case study for research into orthographies in handwriting.

Indexed as

handwritinghandwriting fundamentalsinterdisciplinary framework of handwritingMalay language handwriting

Identifiers

PMID35283681
PMCPMC8887981
OpenAlexW4214587294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.