ArticleThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2022
Preliminary Comparison of Transseptal Microscopic Versus Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery in a University Teaching Hospital.
Article in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Comparison of microscopic transsphenoidal surgery and neuroendoscopic transsphenoidal surgery in pituitary adenoma resection and the risk factors of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is an increasing preferred treatment for sella lesions. In a university teaching hospital, the novel endoscopic TSS was adopted with ongoing resident teaching. We evaluated a single institutional series of preliminary comparisons of transseptal microscopic with endoscopic TSS. Methods: A retrospective data analysis included 37 patients and 19 patients who underwent microscopic and endoscopic TSS, respectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients, intra-operative analyses, morbidity, mortality and visual assessments were included in this analysis. Results: The study included 31 men and 25 women, and median age at surgery was 49 years old (range 14-70 years old). There were no differences between the rates of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula, sinus complications, anterior pituitary hormone deficiency and diabetes insipidus between the groups. Total length of stay and intensive care unit stay were similar between the groups. Patients who underwent endoscopic TSS were at significantly increased risk of epistaxis ( Conclusion: Endoscopic TSS is a promising procedure that allows sufficient visualisation of the surgical field and adequate tumour removal. It is comparable to microscopic TSS but has a higher complication rate notably due to steep learning curve required to gain the expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.