Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35283669›Full record

ReviewCurrent genomics2021

Quantitative Trait Loci Identification by Estimating the Genetic Model based on the Extremal Samples.

Zining Yang, Yaning Yang, Xu Steven Xu, Min Yuan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zining Yang1 Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei230026, China; 2Genmab US, Inc, Princeton, NJ08540, USA; 3Center for Data Science in Health, School of Public Health Administration, Anhui Medical University, Hefei230032, China.
Yaning Yang1 Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei230026, China; 2Genmab US, Inc, Princeton, NJ08540, USA; 3Center for Data Science in Health, School of Public Health Administration, Anhui Medical University, Hefei230032, China.
Xu Steven Xu1 Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei230026, China; 2Genmab US, Inc, Princeton, NJ08540, USA; 3Center for Data Science in Health, School of Public Health Administration, Anhui Medical University, Hefei230032, China.
Min Yuan1 Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei230026, China; 2Genmab US, Inc, Princeton, NJ08540, USA; 3Center for Data Science in Health, School of Public Health Administration, Anhui Medical University, Hefei230032, China.
University of Science and Technology of China · CNAnhui Medical University · CNGenmab (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In genetic association studies with quantitative trait loci (QTL), the association between a candidate genetic marker and the trait of interest is commonly examined by the omnibus F test or by the t-test corresponding to a given genetic model or mode of inheritance. It is known that the t-test with a correct model specification is more powerful than the F test. However, since the underlying genetic model is rarely known in practice, the use of a model-specific t-test may incur substantial power loss. Robust-efficient tests, such as the Maximin Efficiency Robust Test (MERT) and MAX3 have been proposed in the literature. Methods: In this paper, we propose a novel two-step robust-efficient approach, namely, the genetic model selection (GMS) method for quantitative trait analysis. GMS selects a genetic model by testing Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium (HWD) with extremal samples of the population in the first step and then applies the corresponding genetic model-specific t-test in the second step. Results: Simulations show that GMS is not only more efficient than MERT and MAX3, but also has comparable power to the optimal t-test when the genetic model is known. Conclusion: Application to the data from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort demonstrates that the proposed approach can identify meaningful biological SNPs on chromosome 19.

Indexed as

extreme samplesGenetic association studiesgenetic model selectionhardy-weinberg disequilibriumquantitative trait loci

Identifiers

PMID35283669
PMCPMC8844942
OpenAlexW3174740535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.