ReviewCurrent genomics2021
Quantitative Trait Loci Identification by Estimating the Genetic Model based on the Extremal Samples.
Review in Current genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In genetic association studies with quantitative trait loci (QTL), the association between a candidate genetic marker and the trait of interest is commonly examined by the omnibus F test or by the t-test corresponding to a given genetic model or mode of inheritance. It is known that the t-test with a correct model specification is more powerful than the F test. However, since the underlying genetic model is rarely known in practice, the use of a model-specific t-test may incur substantial power loss. Robust-efficient tests, such as the Maximin Efficiency Robust Test (MERT) and MAX3 have been proposed in the literature. Methods: In this paper, we propose a novel two-step robust-efficient approach, namely, the genetic model selection (GMS) method for quantitative trait analysis. GMS selects a genetic model by testing Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium (HWD) with extremal samples of the population in the first step and then applies the corresponding genetic model-specific t-test in the second step. Results: Simulations show that GMS is not only more efficient than MERT and MAX3, but also has comparable power to the optimal t-test when the genetic model is known. Conclusion: Application to the data from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort demonstrates that the proposed approach can identify meaningful biological SNPs on chromosome 19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.