ArticleCurrent genomics2021
Article in Current genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthetic promoter design in plants: integration of computational and experimental approaches.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Isolation and Expression Pattern Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent advances in designing synthetic plant regulatory modules.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of theGenes · 2024Article
- Artificially designed synthetic promoter for a high level of salt induction using a cis-engineering approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genomic insights into CKX genes: key players in cotton fibre development and abiotic stress responses.PeerJ · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Plant yield closely depends on its environment and is negatively affected by abiotic stress conditions like drought, salinity, heat, and cold. Analysis of the stress-inducible genes in Methods: The pattern of these motifs is conserved, which has been analyzed in this study to find the mechanism of gene expression through spacer specificity, inter motif distance preference, functional analysis, and statistical analysis for four different plants, namely Results: The spacer frequency analysis has shown a preference for particular spacer lengths among four genomes. The spacer specificity at all the spacer lengths which predicts dominance of particular base pairs over others, was analyzed to find the preference of the sequences in the flanking region. Functional analysis on stress-regulated genes for saline, osmotic, and heat stress clearly shows that these motif frequencies with inter motif distance (0-30) in the promoter region of Conclusion: Microarray data were analyzed to confirm the role of both motifs in stress response pathways. Transcription factors seem to prefer larger motif size with repeated CCGAC and CATGTG elements. The common preference for one spacer was further validated through Box and Whisker's statistical analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.