ArticleInternational journal of women's health2022
Prognostic Analysis and Comparison of the 2014 and 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System on Overall Survival in Patients with Stage IIB-IVA Cervix Carcinoma.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05709769 (Development and Validation of a CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for the Prediction of Postoperative Malnutrition in Stage IB1-IIA2 Cervical Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development and Validation of a CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for the Prediction of Postoperative Malnutrition in Stage IB1-IIA2 Cervical Cancer (Nutrition Helper-1).
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Stage IIB-IVA cervix carcinoma in elderly patients treated with radiation therapy: a longitudinal cohort study by propensity score matching analysis.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a radiomics-based nomogram for the prediction of postoperative malnutrition in stage IB1-IIA2 cervical carcinoma.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Survival Comparison Between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma for Radiotherapy-Treated Patients with Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IIB-IVA cervix carcinoma (CC) who underwent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BRT) and to compare the prognostic accuracy of the 2014 and 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: Patients with a histopathological diagnosis of CC between 2004 and 2016 were included. The primary endpoint was OS. The prognostic significance for OS was analyzed by the Cox regression model. Prognostic accuracy in evaluating 3- and 5-year OS in different staging systems was evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tdROC) curves. Results: A total of 2585 patients with stage IIB-IVA CC, staged according to the 2014 FIGO staging system, were included in the study. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 63.9% and 56.6%, respectively, with a median OS of 98 months. Independent variables, such as older age at diagnosis, histological grades apart from well or moderately differentiated, large tumor size, advanced tumor stages classified according to the 2014 and 2018 FIGO staging systems and treatment without chemotherapy or unknown were associated with a worse OS. A tdROC analysis conducted using DeLong's tests revealed no significant difference in the prediction of 3- and 5-year OS between the 2014 and 2018 FIGO staging systems ( Conclusion: Both 2014 and 2018 FIGO staging systems were strong prognostic factors for OS. No significant risk classification was observed for stage IIIC1 disease in the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for patients who underwent EBRT and BRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.