Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35283365›Full record

ArticleJournal of obesity & metabolic syndrome2022

Hepatic Fibrosis and Steatosis in Metabolic Syndrome.

Venu Gopala Reddy Gangireddy, Courtney Pilkerton, Jun Xiang, Ruben Tinajero, Amie M Ashcraft

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Burden of MASLD and liver fibrosis: evidence from Phenome India cohort.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Metabolic Syndrome: A Warning Sign of Liver Fibrosis.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Venu Gopala Reddy GangireddyDepartment of Gastroenterology, United Hospital Center, Bridgeport, WV, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-216X
Courtney PilkertonDepartment of Family Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Jun XiangDepartment of Family Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Ruben TinajeroDepartment of Family Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Amie M AshcraftDepartment of Family Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
West Virginia University · USUnited Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a group of factors associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease and overall mortality. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common disorder that has been shown to cause hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. The relationship between NAFLD and MetS appears to be bidirectional, but very few studies have examined the role of MetS in hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. The present study investigated the relationships between MetS and its components and the severity of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis, and fibrosis independent of steatosis. Methods: The study was a cross-sectional population-based survey of 4,678 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants from 2017 to 2018 in the United States. Hepatic fibrosis and steatosis were measured using liver elastography. The MetS components were assessed using demographic, examination, laboratory, and self-reported data. Results: Using survey-weighted population estimates, 26% of the population had steatosis, 7.5% had fibrosis, and 3.3% had fibrosis without steatosis. The adjusted odds ratio for any level of steatosis was 4.12 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.16-5.37) and any level of fibrosis was 3.34 times higher (95% CI, 2.26-4.94) among participants with MetS than those without. The adjusted odds ratio for fibrosis without steatosis is 2.67 times higher (95% CI, 1.47-4.87) among participants with MetS than those without. Conclusion: The presence of MetS significantly increases the risk of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis, providing evidence for MetS to be considered an additional independent risk factor for hepatic fibrosis together with other known etiologies.

Indexed as

Hepatic fibrosisHepatic steatosisMetabolic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35283365
PMCPMC8987451
OpenAlexW4220823556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.