Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35283215›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatology2022

Past COVID-19 and immunosuppressive regimens affect the long-term response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in liver transplant recipients.

Pierluigi Toniutto, Edmondo Falleti, Sara Cmet, Annarosa Cussigh, Laura Veneto, Davide Bitetto, Ezio Fornasiere, Elisa Fumolo, Carlo Fabris, Assunta Sartor and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reply.Hepatology communications · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Vaccination Strategies for a Liver Transplant Recipient.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pierluigi ToniuttoHepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy. Electronic address: pierluigi.toniutto@uniud.it.
Edmondo FalletiClinical Pathology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Sara CmetClinical Pathology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Annarosa CussighClinical Pathology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Laura VenetoHepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Davide BitettoHepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Ezio FornasiereHepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Elisa FumoloHepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Carlo FabrisHepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Assunta SartorMicrobiology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Roberto PeressuttiRegional Center of Liver Transplantation, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Francesco CurcioClinical Pathology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Laura RegattinHospital Health Management, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Lucrezia GrilloneDepartment of Medical Area (DAME), Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
University of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe long-term immunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in liver transplant (LT) recipients is unknown. We aimed to assess the long-term antibody response of the Pfizer-BioNTech® BNT162b2 vaccine in LT recipients compared to controls.

methodsLT recipients underwent anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-receptor-binding domain protein IgG (anti-RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid protein IgG antibody (anti-N) measurements at the first and 1, 4 and 6 months after the second vaccination dose.

resultsOne hundred forty-three LT recipients and 58 controls were enrolled. At baseline, 131/143 (91.6%) LT recipients tested anti-N negative (COVID-19 naïve), and 12/143 (8.4%) tested positive (COVID-19 recovered) compared to negative controls. Among COVID-19 naïve, 22.1% were anti-RBD positives 1 month after the first vaccine dose, while 66.4%, 77%, and 78.8% were 1, 4 and 6 months following the second vaccine dose. In contrast, 100% of controls were positive at 4 months (p <0.001). The median anti-RBD titer 4 months after the second vaccine dose was significantly lower (32 U/ml) in COVID-19 naïve than in controls (852 U/ml, p <0.0001). A higher daily dose of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (p <0.001), higher frequency of ascites (p = 0.012), and lower serum leukocyte count (p = 0.016) were independent predictors of anti-RBD negativity at 6 months. All COVID-19 recovered patients tested positive for anti-RBD at each time point. The median antibody titer was similar in those taking MMF (9,400 U/ml, 11,925 U/ml, 13,305 U/ml, and 10,095 U/ml) or not taking MMF (13,950 U/ml, 9,575 U/ml, 3,500 U/ml, 2,835 U/ml, p = NS) 3 weeks after the first and 1, 4 and 6 months after the second vaccine dose, respectively.

conclusionsIn COVID-19-naïve LT recipients, the immunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was significantly lower than that in controls. MMF was the main determinant of vaccination failure in SARS-CoV-2-naïve patients. LAY SUMMARY: The immunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in liver transplant recipients is currently unknown. Herein, we show that liver transplant recipients who have not previously had COVID-19 are less likely to mount effective antibody responses to vaccination than a control population. The main determinant of vaccination failure was the use of the immunosuppressive drug mycophenolate mofetil.

Indexed as

COVID-19Liver TransplantationAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidSARS-CoV-2Transplant RecipientsVaccinationAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineImmunoglobulin GImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic Acidliver transplantationmRNA vaccinemycophenolate mofetil

Identifiers

PMID35283215
PMCPMC8908852
OpenAlexW4220960897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.