Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35282797›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2022

The relationship between the Keele STarT back screening tool, the short form of central sensitivity inventory and health-related quality of life in patients with low back pain.

Hiraku Nagahori, Takahiro Miki, Hiroshi Momma

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiraku NagahoriDepartment of Rehabilitation, Mitaka Clinic, Mitaka, Japan.
Takahiro MikiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Sapporo Maruyama Orthopedic Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0648-2675
Hiroshi MommaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Kyorin University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mitaka, Japan.
Kyorin University · JPSapporo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt has been reported that the scores of the Keele STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) and the short form of Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-9) are associated with Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients with low back pain (LBP). However, it is unclear which screening tool is more associated with HRQoL in patients with LBP.

objectiveTo identify which SBST and CSI-9 are more related to HRQoL and investigate the association between SBST and CSI-9 scores. STUDY

designCross-sectional study.

methodA multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the factors associated with the HRQoL using age, pain intensity, disability, SBST score, and CSI-9 score as independent variables. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was also conducted to determine the association between SBST and CSI-9 score.

resultsMultiple regression analysis revealed that the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (p < 0.01, β = -0.62, VIF = 1.70) and SBST score (p < 0.01, β = -0.32, VIF = 1.86) were significant associated variables. A significant association was found between SBST and CSI-9 scores (p < 0.01, ρ = 0.47).

conclusionThe results showed that in patients with LBP the association of HRQoL with SBST was more substantial than with CSI-9.

Indexed as

Low Back PainCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaireshealth-related quality of lifeLow back painthe keele STarT back screening tool

Identifiers

PMID35282797
PMCPMC9621249
OpenAlexW4221062025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.