ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2022
Selective Recognition of Carbohydrate Antigens by Germline Antibodies Isolated from AID Knockout Mice.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibody-mediated recognition of chiral poly(2-oxazoline) nanorods driven by enantioselectivity.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Using Synthetic Glycans to Investigate Anti-Glycan Antibodies and Explore Their Medical Potential.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Review
- Integrative Approach to Develop and Characterize Antibodies against the Cancer-Associated Antigen Sialyl Lewis A (CA 19-9).JACS Au · 2026Article
- Editor's Choice Protein engineering strategies to develop lectins by design.Glycobiology · 2025Review
- Anti-glycan monoclonal antibodies: Basic research and clinical applications.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2023Review
- Application of bioanalytical and computational methods in decoding the roles of glycans in host-pathogen interactions.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Germline antibodies, the initial set of antibodies produced by the immune system, are critical for host defense, and information about their binding properties can be useful for designing vaccines, understanding the origins of autoantibodies, and developing monoclonal antibodies. Numerous studies have found that germline antibodies are polyreactive with malleable, flexible binding pockets. While insightful, it remains unclear how broadly this model applies, as there are many families of antibodies that have not yet been studied. In addition, the methods used to obtain germline antibodies typically rely on assumptions and do not work well for many antibodies. Herein, we present a distinct approach for isolating germline antibodies that involves immunizing activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) knockout mice. This strategy amplifies antigen-specific B cells, but somatic hypermutation does not occur because AID is absent. Using synthetic haptens, glycoproteins, and whole cells, we obtained germline antibodies to an assortment of clinically important tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens, including Lewis Y, the Tn antigen, sialyl Lewis C, and Lewis X (CD15/SSEA-1). Through glycan microarray profiling and cell binding, we demonstrate that all but one of these germline antibodies had high selectivity for their glycan targets. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we provide insights into the structural basis of glycan recognition. The results have important implications for designing carbohydrate-based vaccines, developing anti-glycan monoclonal antibodies, and understanding antibody evolution within the immune system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.