ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2022
Effect of pulmonary artery catheter balloon inflation on pulmonary hemodynamics.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Number of attempts and interventions to obtain a valid pulmonary artery wedge pressure.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024Article
- Fluid loading during the hemodynamic evaluation of pulmonary hypertension: a cross-sectional study.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Right heart catheterization (RHC), including a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) determination, is necessary to categorize the hemodynamic type of pulmonary hypertension (PH). The potential hemodynamic implications of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) balloon inflation in PH have not been formally tested. Methods: We assessed the hemodynamic impact of the PAC balloon inflation during RHC by measuring systolic, diastolic, and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) in all patients, and cardiac output (CO) by thermodilution in a subgroup of patients. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained both with PAC balloon deflated and fully inflated (1.5 mL of air), while the PAC was free floating in the pulmonary artery before wedging. We calculated total pulmonary resistance (TPR). Results: We included 210 patients, age 58±14 years, 134 (64%) women. Patients had no PH (n: 12, 6%), PH group 1 (n: 68, 33%), 2 (n: 86, 41%), 3 (n: 11, 5%), 4 (n: 29, 14%), and 5 (n: 3, 1%). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) at end-expiration mPAP (balloon-up minus down) (n: 209) was -0.02±1.59 mmHg (range, -5.0 to 4.0 mmHg; P=0.84), while the TPR (n: 62) was -0.27±1.2 Wood units (WU) (range, -4.8 to 2.2 WU; P=0.08); without significant variation based on the type of PH group or degree of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Interestingly, the change in mPAP at end-expiration with PAC balloon inflation was higher in women (mean ± SD: 0.31±1.43 mmHg) than men (mean ± SD: -0.61±1.70 mmHg) (P<0.001). Conclusions: Balloon inflation of the PAC in the main pulmonary artery had no significant impact on the mPAP or TPR, even when only including patients with group 1 PH or selecting a subgroup with a higher PVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.