Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35282663›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2022

Development of machine learning models for mortality risk prediction after cardiac surgery.

Yunlong Fan, Junfeng Dong, Yuanbin Wu, Ming Shen, Siming Zhu, Xiaoyi He, Shengli Jiang, Jiakang Shao, Chao Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yunlong Fan *Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Junfeng Dong *Department of Organ Transplantation, Changzhen Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yuanbin WuMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Ming ShenDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Siming ZhuMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyi HeMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Shengli JiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiakang ShaoMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Chao SongMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We developed machine learning models that combine preoperative and intraoperative risk factors to predict mortality after cardiac surgery. Methods: Machine learning involving random forest, neural network, support vector machine, and gradient boosting machine was developed and compared with the risk scores of EuroSCORE I and II, Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), as well as a logistic regression model. Clinical data were collected from patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery at the First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital between December 2008 and December 2017. The primary outcome was post-operative mortality. Model performance was estimated using several metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The visualization algorithm was implemented using Shapley's additive explanations. Results: A total of 5,443 patients were enrolled during the study period. The mean EuroSCORE II score was 3.7%, and the actual in-hospital mortality rate was 2.7%. For predicting operative mortality after cardiac surgery, the AUC scores were 0.87, 0.79, 0.81, and 0.82 for random forest, neural network, support vector machine, and gradient boosting machine, compared with 0.70, 0.73, 0.71, and 0.74 for EuroSCORE I and II, STS, and logistic regression model. Shapley's additive explanations analysis of random forest yielded the top-20 predictors and individual-level explanations for each prediction. Conclusions: Machine learning models based on available clinical data may be superior to clinical scoring tools in predicting postoperative mortality in patients following cardiac surgery. Explanatory models show the potential to provide personalized risk profiles for individuals by accounting for the contribution of influencing factors. Additional prospective multicenter studies are warranted to confirm the clinical benefit of these machine learning-driven models.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac surgerymachine learningMortality predictionrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID35282663
PMCPMC8898685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.