ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022
Construction of Novel Prognostic Nomogram for Mucinous and Signet Ring Cell Colorectal Cancer Patients with a Survival Longer Than 5 Years.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma following surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Individualized prediction of conditional survival for colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Observational
- Gastrointestinal signet ring cell malignancy: current advancement and future prospects.Investigational new drugs · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) are aggressive colorectal cancer histological subtypes with dismal prognosis. This study investigated prognostic factors and constructed novel nomograms for MA and SRCC patients who survived for over 5 years to optimize the follow-up regime, especially for early-onset patients. Patients and Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database registered between 2004 and 2018 were extracted. MA and SRCC patients were divided into two groups with survival time of 5 years as a cut-off point. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined by Cox regression models, and survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 8286 MA patients (45.73%) and 551 SRCC patients (20.32%) who survived for over 5 years. Multivariable Cox analyses identified age, tumor location, N stage, metastasis, CEA level, surgery, and lymph nodes dissection as independent risk factors for MACSS. SRCC was more aggressive and only N2 stage (P = 0.011) and metastasis (P = 0.043) were inversely associated with SRCCSS. Furthermore, we observed that small tumor size, well differentiation, and chemotherapy no longer provided survival benefit to ≥5-year survivors. Therefore, we constructed novel nomograms appropriate for MA patients who survived for over 5 years. The consistency indexes for predicting 10-year OS and CSS were respectively 0.717, 0.712 in the training cohort and 0.727, 0.735 in the validation cohort. Conclusion: Our well-calibrated nomograms represent the first clinical prognostic models developed especially for MA patients with a survival longer than 5 years. For both MA and SRCC patients, TNM stage was a stable prognostic factor, while the prognostic values of tumor size, differentiation grade, and chemotherapy changed over time. We are hopeful that our prognostic models will help define personalized follow-up managements to further prolong patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.