Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35282477›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2022

IMPACT OF CEMENTLESS ZWEYMÜLLER STEM ANTEVERSION ON RESISTANCE TO PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.

Tomislav Čengić, Janoš Kodvanj, Tomislav Smoljanović, Petra Adamović, Andrija Alerić, Ivan Bohaček, Milan Milošević, Srećko Sabalić, Domagoj Delimar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. UNCEMENTEDActa clinica Croatica · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomislav Čengić1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Experimental Mechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Janoš Kodvanj1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Experimental Mechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomislav Smoljanović1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Experimental Mechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Petra Adamović1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Experimental Mechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Andrija Alerić1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Experimental Mechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivan Bohaček1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Experimental Mechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Milan Milošević1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Experimental Mechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Srećko Sabalić1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Experimental Mechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Domagoj Delimar1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Experimental Mechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
University Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty implies proper orientation of both acetabular and femoral components with a range of 25-40° of combined anteversion. The aim of the study was to examine resistance to periprosthetic fracture of the axially loaded cross section rectangular femoral stem (Zweymüller) with respect to different degrees of anteversion, implanted in the artificial bone model, in laboratory conditions. Femoral bone models with implanted femoral stems were divided into 3 groups depending on the degree of stem anteversion (A, control group 13-17°; B, stem retroverted 0°-4°; and C, stem anteverted 26-30°). The amount of axial load leading to periprosthetic fracture (PPFx) of the artificial bone model was determined experimentally for each construct. The results showed that the load at which the PPFx occurred significantly increased with the increase of the endoprosthesis anteversion angle. In our clinical practice, we are often unable to place the acetabular component in an ideal grade of anteversion for intraoperatively determined reasons. The results of this experimental study suggested that increasing rectangular femoral (Zweymüller) stem anteversion lowered the risk of PPFx. This study was limited by experimental design (laboratory conditions, artificial bone) and should be clinically verified.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisPeriprosthetic FracturesFemurHumansArtificial bone modelPeriprosthetic fractureTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35282477
PMCPMC8907947
OpenAlexW4220942770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.