Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35282474›Full record

ReviewActa clinica Croatica2022

ANTIPLATELET THERAPY AFTER CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGERY - UNEVENNESS OF DAILY CLINICAL PRACTICE.

Ivana Sopek-Merkaš, Nenad Lakušić, Krunoslav Fučkar, Duško Cerovec, Kristina Marić Bešić

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivana Sopek-Merkaš1Krapinske Toplice Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation, Krapinske Toplice, Croatia; 2Faculty of Medicine in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 3Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Nenad Lakušić1Krapinske Toplice Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation, Krapinske Toplice, Croatia; 2Faculty of Medicine in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 3Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Krunoslav Fučkar1Krapinske Toplice Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation, Krapinske Toplice, Croatia; 2Faculty of Medicine in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 3Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Duško Cerovec1Krapinske Toplice Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation, Krapinske Toplice, Croatia; 2Faculty of Medicine in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 3Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Kristina Marić Bešić1Krapinske Toplice Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation, Krapinske Toplice, Croatia; 2Faculty of Medicine in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 3Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 4Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Osijek · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiplatelet therapy is an integral part of optimal medicamentous therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. The strategy of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy is adjusted (combination of drugs, dosing and duration of therapy) depending on the stage of the disease (acute coronary syndrome with percutaneous coronary intervention, chronic coronary syndrome, or coronary surgical revascularization) and comorbidity of each patient (e.g., atrial fibrillation, left ventricular thrombus, etc.). Guidelines and clinical practice in particular are not uniform and specific regarding dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, especially in the setting of chronic coronary syndrome.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCoronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary Artery BypassHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAntiplatelet therapyCoronary artery bypass graftingCoronary artery disease

Identifiers

PMID35282474
PMCPMC8907948
OpenAlexW4220804848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.