Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35282412›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2022

Highly efficient A-to-G base editing by ABE8.17 in rabbits.

Ding Zhao, Yuqiang Qian, Jinze Li, Zhanjun Li, Liangxue Lai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Zoological research · 2025
    Article
  2. DUT (p.Y116C)-Mutation-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Rabbits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Targeted mutagenesis in mice via an engineered AsCas12f1 system.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ding ZhaoKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China.
Yuqiang QianKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China.
Jinze LiKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China.
Zhanjun LiKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China.
Liangxue LaiKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China.
Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenine base editors (ABEs), composed of an evolved adenine deaminase fused to the Cas9 nickase, enable efficient and precise A-to-G conversion in various organisms. However, the base editing of some challenging loci with the ABE7.10 system in rabbits was inefficient in our previous study. Here, we show that ABE8.17 and SpRY-ABE8.17 can efficiently induce base editing in mouse and rabbit embryos. In addition, this strategy can be used to precisely mimic clinical point mutations in rabbits. Furthermore, by eliminating the linker in ABE8.17, we created ABE8.17-NL, which achieved efficient base editing within a narrowed window (2-4 nts) in human HEK293FT cells. Collectively, these findings show that ABE8.17 systems can efficiently induce efficient A-to-G base editing at desired sites and that the ABE7.10 system is inefficient, thus providing an efficient way to generate ideal disease models in rabbits.

Indexed as

ABE8.17adenine base editorsalbinismEDMDrabbitSpRYCas9

Identifiers

PMID35282412
PMCPMC8888895
OpenAlexW4210266395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.