Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35282335›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Risk Stratification Model for Predicting Coronary Care Unit Readmission.

Tien-Yu Chen, Chien-Hao Tseng, Po-Jui Wu, Wen-Jung Chung, Chien-Ho Lee, Chia-Chen Wu, Cheng-I Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tien-Yu ChenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chien-Hao TsengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Po-Jui WuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wen-Jung ChungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chien-Ho LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chia-Chen WuDivision of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Branch, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Cheng-I ChengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Use of statistical models for assessing the clinical risk of readmission to medical and surgical intensive care units is well established. However, models for predicting risk of coronary care unit (CCU) readmission are rarely reported. Therefore, this study investigated the characteristics and outcomes of patients readmitted to CCU to identify risk factors for CCU readmission and to establish a scoring system for identifying patients at high risk for CCU readmission. Methods: Medical data were collected for 27,841 patients with a history of readmission to the CCU of a single multi-center healthcare provider in Taiwan during 2001-2019. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between a readmission group and a non-readmission group. Data were segmented at a 9:1 ratio for model building and validation. Results: The number of patients with a CCU readmission history after transfer to a standard care ward was 1,790 (6.4%). The eleven factors that had the strongest associations with CCU readmission were used to develop and validate a CCU readmission risk scoring and prediction model. When the model was used to predict CCU readmission, the receiver-operating curve characteristic was 0.7038 for risk score model group and 0.7181 for the validation group. A CCU readmission risk score was assigned to each patient. The patients were then stratified by risk score into low risk (0-12), moderate risk (13-31) and high risk (32-40) cohorts check scores, which showed that CCU readmission risk significantly differed among the three groups. Conclusions: This study developed a model for estimating CCU readmission risk. By using the proposed model, clinicians can improve CCU patient outcomes and medical care quality.

Indexed as

coronary care unit (CCU)dischargeprediction score modelreadmissionrisk

Identifiers

PMID35282335
PMCPMC8907527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.