Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35282255›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Empathy, Emotion Recognition, and Paranoia in the General Population.

Kendall Beals, Sarah H Sperry, Julia M Sheffield

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
75.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Emotion Authenticity Recognition (EAR) test: normative data of an innovative test using dynamic emotional stimuli to evaluate the ability to recognize the authenticity of emotions expressed by faces.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kendall BealsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Sarah H SperryMichigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Julia M SheffieldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USMichigan United · US

Funding

Cognitive mechanisms of delusion severity throughout recovery from a psychotic episode: a computational approachK23MH126313 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHEFFIELD, JULIA MAY · 2021 to 2025
$821k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH126313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Paranoia is associated with a multitude of social cognitive deficits, observed in both clinical and subclinical populations. Empathy is significantly and broadly impaired in schizophrenia, yet its relationship with subclinical paranoia is poorly understood. Furthermore, deficits in emotion recognition - a very early component of empathic processing - are present in both clinical and subclinical paranoia. Deficits in emotion recognition may therefore underlie relationships between paranoia and empathic processing. The current investigation aims to add to the literature on social cognition and paranoia by: (1) characterizing the relationship between paranoia and empathy, and (2) testing whether there is an indirect effect of emotion recognition on the relationship between empathy and paranoia. Methods: Paranoia, empathy, and emotion recognition were assessed in a non-clinical sample of adults ( Results: Paranoia was associated with the Fantasy subscale of the IRI, such that higher Fantasy was associated with more severe paranoia ( Discussion: These results suggest that imaginative perspective-taking contributes to paranoia in the general population. These data do not, however, point to robust global relationships between empathy and paranoia or to emotion recognition as an underlying mechanism. Deficits in empathy and emotion recognition observed in schizophrenia may be associated with the broader pathology of schizophrenia, and therefore not detectable with subclinical populations.

Indexed as

emotion recognition (ER)empathyinterpersonal reactivity index (IRI)paranoiastructural equation modeling (SEM)

Identifiers

PMID35282255
PMCPMC8908382
OpenAlexW4213457594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.