Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35282164›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2022

A 'Mini Linguistic State Examination' to classify primary progressive aphasia.

Nikil Patel, Katie A Peterson, Ruth U Ingram, Ian Storey, Stefano F Cappa, Eleonora Catricala, Ajay Halai, Karalyn E Patterson, Matthew A Lambon Ralph, James B Rowe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The include network: Advancing cross-linguistic equity in brain health research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Language disorders in understudied languages: Opening editorial.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nikil PatelMolecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2888-9668
Katie A PetersonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK.
Ruth U IngramDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Ian StoreyMolecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0952-0673
Stefano F CappaUniversity Institute for Advanced Studies IUSS, Pavia, Italy.
Eleonora CatricalaUniversity Institute for Advanced Studies IUSS, Pavia, Italy.
Ajay HalaiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1725-7948
Karalyn E PattersonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1927-7424
Matthew A Lambon RalphMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-2488
James B RoweDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK.
Peter GarrardMolecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-9718

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/9Medical Research Council MR/N025881/1Wellcome Trust 103838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are few available methods for qualitatively evaluating patients with primary progressive aphasia. Commonly adopted approaches are time-consuming, of limited accuracy or designed to assess different patient populations. This paper introduces a new clinical test-the Mini Linguistic State Examination-which was designed uniquely to enable a clinician to assess and subclassify both classical and mixed presentations of primary progressive aphasia. The adoption of a novel assessment method (error classification) greatly amplifies the clinical information that can be derived from a set of standard linguistic tasks and allows a five-dimensional profile to be defined. Fifty-four patients and 30 matched controls were recruited. Five domains of language competence (motor speech, phonology, semantics, syntax and working memory) were assessed using a sequence of 11 distinct linguistic assays. A random forest classification was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy for predicting primary progressive aphasia subtypes and create a decision tree as a guide to clinical classification. The random forest prediction model was 96% accurate overall (92% for the logopenic variant, 93% for the semantic variant and 98% for the non-fluent variant). The derived decision tree produced a correct classification of 91% of participants whose data were not included in the training set. The Mini Linguistic State Examination is a new cognitive test incorporating a novel and powerful, yet straightforward, approach to scoring. Rigorous assessment of its diagnostic accuracy confirmed excellent matching of primary progressive aphasia syndromes to clinical gold standard diagnoses. Adoption of the Mini Linguistic State Examination by clinicians will have a decisive impact on the consistency and uniformity with which patients can be described clinically. It will also facilitate screening for cohort-based research, including future therapeutic trials, and is suitable for describing, quantifying and monitoring language deficits in other brain disorders.

Indexed as

frontotemporal dementiaprimary progressive aphasiarandom forest classifier

Identifiers

PMID35282164
PMCPMC8914496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.