ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2022
Sociodemographic Differences in Respondent Preferences for Survey Formats: Sampling Bias and Potential Threats to External Validity.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Mapping health-related quality of life measurement tools in Africa: a scoping review.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Trends in toxicological findings and drug seizures of MDMA in New Zealand from 2010 to 2022.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
- Dental fear, anxiety, oral hygiene and dental caries in Al Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Predictive Factors for Clinical Improvement Following a Manual Therapy-Based Program in Patients with Neck Pain: A Prescriptive Clinical Prediction Rule Derivation Study.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Digital tools for assessing bipolar disorder: A scoping review of the current landscape.Neuroscience applied · 2026Article
- Associations between survey completion mode and sociodemographic factors among individuals eligible for lung cancer screening.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Exploration of Diagnosis Experience in Saudi Women.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Age-Related Differences in Anxiety and Depression Diagnosis among Adults in Puerto Rico during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- COVID-19: Factors Predicting Depressive Symptoms in People Aging With Long-Term Physical Disabilities.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2023Article
- The effect of exercise and affect regulation skills on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey.Psychiatry research · 2022Article
- A United States-based patient-reported adult polyglucosan body disease registry: initial results.Therapeutic advances in rare diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore sampling bias as a result of survey format selection by examining associations between characteristics of people aging with long-term physical disability (PAwLTPD) and their preferences for phone or web-based survey format. Design: A cross-sectional study using a secondary data analysis approach. Setting: Data were from an ongoing longitudinal cohort study conducted in the community. Participants: Convenience sampling was used. PAwLTPD who participated in year 2 of the longitudinal cohort study were included. Inclusion criteria were age 45-65 years, English speaking, and self-reported onset of a physical disability at least 5 years prior to study recruitment. Two participants completed the survey using both phone and web formats and were thus excluded; 387 participants (N=387) were included in the analysis. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Choice of survey format and demographics (age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status, living arrangement, socioeconomic status) were collected in addition to self-rated physical health. Results: Participants were on average 58.2±5.6 years old. A total of 33% were male, and 62% were White. Approximately 40% of participants completed phone surveys. The phone survey group was significantly older ( Conclusions: Sociodemographics are associated with survey format choice in PAwLTPD. Findings largely support the existing understanding of digital literacy but also provide insight into the potential occurrence of sampling bias when multiple survey format options are not offered. These findings have implications for investigators who aim to reach a more representative sample of people with disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.