ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2022
Perspectives From Persons With Multiple Sclerosis for a Comprehensive Real-World Change Therapy for Mobility.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the personal perspectives of persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) on the acceptability of a novel physical therapy program that is designed to transfer gains from the clinic to their real-world lower extremity (LE) use, termed LE constraint-induced therapy (CIT). The program includes several behavior change techniques (prescribed home exercises, daily structured therapist interviews and problem solving for LE activities, keeping an activity diary) and a concentrated physical treatment schedule. Design: Anonymous internet survey. Setting: Participants accessed the survey from computers in the community. Participants: Five hundred adults (N=500) were recruited from an MS support organization's registry for having indicated from mild to total limb spasticity because they were anticipated to have markedly impaired LE use in the community. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Participants were offered the options on a nonnumerical Likert scale of "Very likely," "Likely," "Neutral," "Unlikely," or "Very unlikely" to indicate their personal acceptability for each of 5 different key treatment procedures after these were explained. Totals for each option within each key procedure were analyzed for their acceptability. Results: Of the 281 persons who responded, 90% expressed interest in participating in LE CIT. A large majority of persons who completed the survey selected either "Very likely" or "Likely" for each key procedure (median=88%, range=65%-90%, Conclusions: The results suggest there is strong acceptance of CIT for mobility with preliminary evidence of benefiting community LE use for persons with MS. The results support further clinical trials of LE CIT for persons with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.