Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35282076›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Application research of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in predicting prosthetic valve size for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Xin Meng, Yandan Sun, Wei Bai, Yuxi Li, Shengjun Tuo, Liang Cao, Mengmeng Du, Yang Liu, Ping Jin, Jian Yang and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xin Meng *Department of Ultrasound, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yandan Sun *Department of Ultrasound, The 986th Hospital of the Air Force, Xi'an, China.
Wei BaiDepartment of Ultrasound, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yuxi LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Shengjun TuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Liang CaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Mengmeng DuDepartment of Ultrasound, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ping JinDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jian YangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Liwen LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xijing Hospital · CNAir Force Medical University · CNPeople 's Liberation Army 451 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative method to treat patients with severe aortic valve disease. Accurate measurement of the aortic valve annulus and selection of the appropriate artificial valve are critical to the success of TAVI. Multilayer spiral computed tomography (MSCT) is recommended as the "gold standard" for assessing the aortic valve annulus before TAVI. However, MSCT scanning may not be possible for patients with iodine allergy, renal failure, or pregnancy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the aortic valve annulus by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) and compare the results with MSCT, exploring the feasibility of 3D-TEE to guide the selection of artificial valve implantation in TAVI. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 74 patients who successfully underwent TAVI in our hospital. Before the operation, 3D-TEE and MSCT were used to measure the maximum diameter, minimum diameter, area-derived diameter, and perimeter-derived diameter of the aortic valve annulus, and the results were analyzed for consistency. To predict the valve size based on 3D-TEE and the MSCT area-derived diameter, we compared the differences between the predicted valve size and the actual implanted valve size, and analyzed the differences between 3D-TEE and MSCT for guiding the selection of the prosthetic valve size. Results: There was no significant difference between 3D-TEE and MSCT in the measurement of the maximum diameter, minimum diameter, area, and perimeter of the aortic annulus and their derived diameter (P>0.05). The intraclass correlation coefficients for the maximum diameter, minimum diameter, area-derived diameter, and perimeter-derived diameter of the aortic annulus were 0.89, 0.83, 0.84, and 0.92, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the accuracy of both methods, 3D-TEE and MSCT, in predicting different prosthetic valve sizes for TAVI (P>0.05). Conclusions: 3D-TEE and MSCT have good agreement for measuring the values of various parameters of the aortic annulus. The accuracy of both methods was similar for predicting the aortic prosthetic valve size. 3D-TEE may provide guidance for selecting the prosthetic valve size for TAVI.

Indexed as

multilayer spiral computed tomography (MSCT)prosthetic valve sizeThree-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE)transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)valve annulus

Identifiers

PMID35282076
PMCPMC8848372
OpenAlexW4206999548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.