Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35282055›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Clinical application of 3D-printed patient-specific guide plate combined with computer navigation in acetabular reconstruction following resection of periacetabular tumors.

Jingyi Dang, Jun Fu, Dong Liu, Zhao Zhang, Zhenzhou Mi, Debin Cheng, Xincheng Liu, Yushen Zhang, Dongze Zhu, Lei Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Augmented reality for intraoperative verification of surgical template placement.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jingyi Dang *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jun Fu *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Dong LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhao ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhenzhou MiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Debin ChengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xincheng LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yushen ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Dongze ZhuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yubo ShiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Hongbin FanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The precise acetabular reconstruction has historically been a challenging procedure. 3D-printed patient-specific guide (PSG) and computer navigation (CN) technologies have been used to assist acetabular component positioning and pelvic reconstruction. This precise reconstruction approach may translate into clinical benefit. Methods: The clinical data of 84 patients who underwent periacetabular malignant tumor resection and screw-rod-acetabular cage system reconstruction in our center from January 2013 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into four groups: free hand (FH) group, PSG group, CN group, and PSG combined with computer navigation (PSG + CN) group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and number of fluoroscopy views were recorded. The oncological prognosis, radiographic measurements of the acetabulum, limb function data, and postoperative complications were compared among groups. And finally, we evaluated the risk factors for mechanical failure of the prosthesis. Results: The postoperative X-ray and computed tomography (CT) scan revealed that the vertical offset discrepancy (VOD) between affected side and contralateral side was 8.4±1.9, 5.9±2.2, 4.1±1.3, and 2.4±1.2 mm in each groups; the horizontal offset discrepancy (HOD) was 9.0±1.9, 6.1±2.2, 3.2±1.3, and 2.1±1.2 mm, correspondingly; the abduction angle discrepancy (ABAD) was 8.6°±1.8°, 5.6°±2.0°, 2.5°±1.3°, and 1.8°±0.9°, respectively; the anteversion angle discrepancy (ANAD) was 5.9°±1.6°, 3.6°±1.7°, 2.9°±1.6°, and 1.9°±0.9°, correspondingly. Statistical results show that the PSG + CN group was superior to the FH group and the PSG group in terms of acetabular position and limb function (P<0.05). Body mass index (P=0.040) and resection type (P=0.042) were found to be the high-risk factors for mechanical failure of the prosthesis. Conclusions: PSG + CN has potential advantages in improving the accuracy and safety of acetabular positioning and reconstruction.

Indexed as

acetabular positioningGuide platehemipelvic reconstructionnavigation

Identifiers

PMID35282055
PMCPMC8848447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.