ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Newly diagnosed asthma in China: initial severity and changes over a 1-year management period.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benefits of CMAB007 in Chinese Patients Having Inadequately Controlled Moderate/Severe Asthma With Increased Total IgE: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Article
- Observational
- Omalizumab for Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma in real-world clinical setting: a prospective, observational study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are no large sample, epidemiological data describing initial asthma severity and change. We used a large health care database to examine asthma severity at initial diagnosis, and the changes in severity over the first year of management. Methods: The clinical data of patients diagnosed with asthma for the first time were collated from the SuValue electronic medical database. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (I) patients who were 14 years or older at the time of first diagnosis; (II) initial diagnosis occurred between Jan 2001 and Mar 2019; (III) patients were followed up for at least 12 months; (IV) patients had follow-up visits every 3 months. Disease severity at diagnosis and at each follow-up visit, medications prescribed were collated and analyzed. Results: A total of 7,654 adult patients with newly diagnosed asthma from tertiary hospitals (26.38%) and secondary hospitals (73.62%), who were followed up for at least 12 months, were included in this retrospective analysis. Approximately 54% of patients were females and the largest age group was over 60 years old (37.66%). Nearly 16% of patients were moderate to severe asthma initially. The proportions of patients with moderate and severe asthma decreased during the first 6 months, and remained stable thereafter. At the end of the 1-year follow-up period, 2.7% of patients had severe asthma. Patients with mild asthma tended to continue to have mild asthma in the following 3 months (>76.19%). However, of the patients with mild or moderate asthma at 3 months, 92.85% and 75.1%, respectively, experienced maintenance and reduction in severity and had mild asthma by 12 months. 1.26% and 3.15% of patients with mild or moderate asthma, respectively, progressed to severe asthma by 12 months. Conclusions: Patients with mild asthma did not progress but rather, remained stable with mild asthma over the year. A proportion of patients diagnosed with moderate and severe asthma remained stable over a 1-year period. Further studies should be conducted to examine the clinical features of newly diagnosed patients with severe asthma without reduction in severity in order to facilitate intensive treatment and reduce the disease burden for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.