Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35281883›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2022

Effect of Perceived Self-Vulnerability on Prostate Cancer Screening Uptake and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study of Public Health Facilities in Western Kenya.

Charles Oduor Opondo, Patrick Ogola Onyango, Collins Otieno Asweto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charles Oduor OpondoDepartment of Public Health, Maseno University, Private Bag, Maseno, KE.ORCID 0000-0001-5413-5224
Patrick Ogola OnyangoSchool of Physical and Biological Sciences, Maseno University, Private Bag, Maseno, KE.ORCID 0000-0002-5227-9571
Collins Otieno AswetoDepartment of Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Embu, P. O. Box 6 - 60100, Embu, KE.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-9836
Maseno University · KEUniversity of Embu · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Perceived self-vulnerability to prostate cancer is known to influence screening uptake among men in the general population. However, knowledge gap persists on the influence of perceived self-vulnerability to prostate cancer on uptake of screening among male health workers; a demographic that has health insurance and is assumed to have knowledge of screening services for prostate cancer. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of perceived self-vulnerability to prostate cancer on screening uptake among male health workers in Kisumu County, western Kenya. Methods: This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study with a descriptive and analytical design. A modified self-administered questionnaire on self-vulnerability was issued to 197 male health workers who were randomly sampled from a study population of 336 eligible participants. The study was conducted at purposively selected public health facilities. Findings: Level of self-reported screening uptake was 27%. Rural residence (AOR = 0.71: 95% CI, 0.32-1.57, p = 0.019), education level (AOR = 5.01; 95% CI, 1.2-20.86, p = 0.027), participant's lack of knowledge about screening services covered by health insurance schemes of which they are members (AOR = 0.2, 95% CI, 0.08-0.5, p = 0.001), good perception of health status (AOR = 4; 95% CI: 1.52-10.53, p = 005) were determinants of screening uptake for prostate cancer. Perceived self-vulnerability to prostate cancer didn't influence screening uptake of participants (p < 0.05). Participants from rural set-up had a higher likelihood of perceiving themselves to be at risk of prostate cancer (AOR = 2.35, 95% CI, 1.17-4.72, p < 0.05) compared to those form urban settings. Old age of 60 years and above (AOR = 3.5, 95% CI: 0.3-40.98, p < 0.002) was predictive of perceived self-vulnerability. Conclusion: Findings from this study showed low uptake of screening and low perceived self-vulnerability to prostate cancer. Perceived self-vulnerability did not influence screening uptake for prostate cancer. Screening knowledge of prostate cancer as covered by health insurance, good perception of health status and level of education should be integrated in screening programs that are individualized on the basis of personal preferences and informed decision making regarding the uncertainty of benefit and the associated harms of screening.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerProstatic NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHealth FacilitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID35281883
PMCPMC8855733
OpenAlexW4213343414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.