Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35281695›Full record

ArticleHuman Interface and the Management of Information. Information-Rich and Intelligent Environments : Thematic Area, HIMI 2021, Held as Part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24-29, 2021, Proceedings,...2021

Advancing Inclusive Mentoring Through an Online Mentor Training Program and Coordinated Discussion Group.

Kelly A Young, Malcolm A Finney, Panadda Marayong, Kim-Phuong L Vu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information-Rich and Intelligent Environments : Thematic Area, HIMI 2021, Held as Part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24-29, 2021, Proceedings,..., 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pre-Professor Program: A Virtual Training Program to Improve Faculty Diversity.Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelly A YoungDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA.
Malcolm A FinneyDepartment of Linguistics, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA.
Panadda MarayongDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA.
Kim-Phuong L VuDepartment of Psychology, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA.

Funding

CSULB Building Biomedical Research Program: Overall ComponentUL1GM118979 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH · PI CHUN, CHI-AH, DILLON, JESSE · 2015 to 2023
$20.7M
CSULB Building Biomedical Research Program: Student Training CoreTL4GM118980 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH · PI CHUN, CHI-AH, DILLON, JESSE · 2015 to 2023
$12.3M
CSULB Building Biomedical Research Program: Research Enrichment CoreRL5GM118978 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH · PI CHUN, CHI-AH, DILLON, JESSE · 2015 to 2023
$7.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS RL5 GM118978NIGMS NIH HHS TL4 GM118980NIGMS NIH HHS UL1 GM118979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mentoring is key to ensure success of the high impact practice of undergraduate-led research and scholarly activities; however, most faculty and staff members are not trained in the best practices of mentoring undergraduate students. The National Institutes of Health-funded Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (NIH BUILD) Initiative at California State University Long Beach is developing an online mentor training program with a coordinated discussion group to refine mentoring skills across faculty and staff from all disciplines. Faculty and staff members participated in two pilots of the Advancing Inclusive Mentoring (AIM) Program, where participants watched training videos and came together to discuss mentoring: either face-to-face (spring 2020) or virtually (fall 2020). Participants indicated that the videos and discussion were engaging and reported that AIM provided useful information on communicating with their own mentees as well as with any student on campus. Participants also reported that AIM provided strategies to work with students from diverse backgrounds and strengthened their commitment to inclusive mentoring. Finally, participants indicated that they would recommend AIM to colleagues and that the program was not only beneficial to their mentoring, but also that they would put into practice techniques that they had learned. There were some differences in usage, but no significant differences in participants' ratings of the program across the two delivery formats. Thus, the AIM Program with facilitated discussion appears to provide a useful mentor training experience in both in-person and virtual formats. Because this unique program is intentionally inclusive to faculty and staff mentors across all disciplines, the goal is that this training will ultimately benefit student success across campus.

Indexed as

Faculty developmentMentor trainingOnline learning

Identifiers

PMID35281695
PMCPMC8916542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.