ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2022
Telehealth Use and Hospital Readmission Rates in Long-term Care Facilities in Southeastern Minnesota During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Program Changes Including Telemedicine and Telephonic Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Preventing 30-Day Hospital Readmission for Patients in a Care Transitions Program.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the length of a telehealth visit predicted the risk of hospital readmission at 30 days in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in southeastern Minnesota during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in SNFs located in southeastern Minnesota from March 1, 2020 through July 15, 2020. The primary outcomes included hospitalization within 30 days of a video visit, and the secondary outcome was the number of provider video visits during the stay at an SNF. The primary predictor was the duration of video visits, and we collected the data regarding other known predictors of hospitalization. We used the χ Results: We included 722 patients (mean age, 82.8 years [SD, 10.8 years]). Of those, 76 SNF residents (10.5%) were rehospitalized within 30 days. The average length of a video visit was 34.0 minutes (SD, 22.7 minutes) in admitted residents compared with 30.0 minutes (SD, 15.9 minutes) in nonadmitted residents. After full adjustment, there was no difference in the video visit duration between admitted and nonadmitted residents (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03). The number of subsequent provider video visits was 2.26 (SD, 1.9) in admitted residents vs 1.58 (SD, 1.6), which was significant after adjustment (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.34). Conclusion: There was no difference in the length of video visits for hospitalized SNF residents vs those who were not hospitalized within 30 days of a video visit. There were more visits in residents with hospital readmission. This may reflect the acuity of care for patients requiring a hospital stay. More research is needed to determine the ideal use of telehealth during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in the postacute and long-term care environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.