Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35281651›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2022

The efficacy and safety of high-pressure processing of food.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ Panel), Konstantinos Koutsoumanis, Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez, Declan Bolton, Sara Bover-Cid, Marianne Chemaly, Robert Davies, Alessandra De Cesare, Lieve Herman, Friederike Hilbert and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Probiotic Dairy Innovations: Exploring Buffalo Milk Potential for Food Product Development.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ Panel)
Konstantinos Koutsoumanis
Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez
Declan Bolton
Sara Bover-Cid
Marianne Chemaly
Robert Davies
Alessandra De Cesare
Lieve Herman
Friederike Hilbert
Roland Lindqvist
Maarten Nauta
Luisa Peixe
Giuseppe Ru
Marion Simmons
Panagiotis Skandamis
Elisabetta Suffredini
Laurence Castle
Matteo Crotta
Konrad Grob
Maria Rosaria Milana
Annette Petersen
Artur Xavier Roig Sagués
Filipa Vinagre Silva
Eric Barthélémy
Anna Christodoulidou
Winy Messens
Ana Allende

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-pressure processing (HPP) is a non-thermal treatment in which, for microbial inactivation, foods are subjected to isostatic pressures (P) of 400-600 MPa with common holding times (t) from 1.5 to 6 min. The main factors that influence the efficacy (log

Indexed as

foodHigh‐pressure processingmicrobial inactivationmilkready‐to‐eat productssafety concern

Identifiers

PMID35281651
PMCPMC8902661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.