Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35281514›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Common Cholinergic, Noradrenergic, and Serotonergic Drugs Do Not Block VNS-Mediated Plasticity.

Robert A Morrison, Stephanie T Abe, Tanya Danaphongse, Vikram Ezhil, Armaan Somaney, Katherine S Adcock, Robert L Rennaker, Michael P Kilgard, Seth A Hays

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert A MorrisonSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Stephanie T AbeTexas Biomedical Device Center, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Tanya DanaphongseTexas Biomedical Device Center, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Vikram EzhilTexas Biomedical Device Center, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Armaan SomaneyTexas Biomedical Device Center, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Katherine S AdcockSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Robert L RennakerSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Michael P KilgardSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Seth A HaysSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USTexas Biomedical Research Institute · US

Funding

Evaluation of the Neuromodulatory Mechanisms of Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Improve Motor Rehabilitation after StrokeR01NS094384 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI HAYS, SETH ALANSON · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Enhancing Recovery after Chronic Bilateral Cervical Spinal Cord Injury with Targeted Plasticity TherapyR01NS103803 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI KILGARD, MICHAEL P, RENNAKER, ROBERT L · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094384NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS103803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during motor rehabilitation enhances recovery from a wide array of neurological injuries and was recently approved by the U.S. FDA for chronic stroke. The benefits of VNS result from precisely timed engagement of neuromodulatory networks during rehabilitative training, which promotes synaptic plasticity in networks activated by rehabilitation. Previous studies demonstrate that lesions that deplete these neuromodulatory networks block VNS-mediated plasticity and accompanying enhancement of recovery. There is a great deal of interest in determining whether commonly prescribed pharmacological interventions that influence these neuromodulatory networks would similarly impair VNS effects. Here, we sought to directly test the effects of three common pharmaceuticals at clinically relevant doses that target neuromodulatory pathways on VNS-mediated plasticity in rats. To do so, rats were trained on a behavioral task in which jaw movement during chewing was paired with VNS and received daily injections of either oxybutynin, a cholinergic antagonist, prazosin, an adrenergic antagonist, duloxetine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, or saline. After the final behavioral session, intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) was used to evaluate reorganization of motor cortex representations, with area of cortex eliciting jaw movement as the primary outcome. In animals that received control saline injections, VNS paired with training significantly increased the movement representation of the jaw compared to naïve animals, consistent with previous studies. Similarly, none of the drugs tested blocked this VNS-dependent reorganization of motor cortex. The present results provide direct evidence that these common pharmaceuticals, when used at clinically relevant doses, are unlikely to adversely impact the efficacy of VNS therapy.

Indexed as

acetylcholinemotor cortexneuromodulationneuroplasticitynorepinephrinerehabilitationserotoninvagus nerve stimulation (VNS)

Identifiers

PMID35281514
PMCPMC8904722
OpenAlexW4213000804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.