Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35281503›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Case Report: Plasticity in Central Sensory Finger Representation and Touch Perception After Microsurgical Reconstruction of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Injury.

Jennifer Ernst, Thomas Weiss, Nadine Wanke, Jens Frahm, Gunther Felmerer, Dario Farina, Arndt F Schilling, Meike A Wilke

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer ErnstDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics, and Plastic Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Thomas WeissClinical Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Nadine WankeFakultät Life Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences (HAW Hamburg), Hamburg, Germany.
Jens FrahmBiomedizinische Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Forschungs-GmbH am Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen, Germany.
Gunther FelmererDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics, and Plastic Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Dario FarinaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Arndt F SchillingDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics, and Plastic Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Meike A WilkeDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics, and Plastic Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEHAW Hamburg · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEImperial College London · GBMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After brachial plexus injury (BPI), early microsurgery aims at facilitating reconnection of the severed peripheral nerves with their orphan muscles and sensory receptors and thereby reestablishing communication with the brain. In order to investigate this sensory recovery, here we combined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and tactile psychophysics in a patient who suffered a sharp, incomplete amputation of the dominant hand at the axilla level. To determine somatosensory detection and discomfort thresholds as well as sensory accuracy for fingers of both the intact and affected hand, we used electrotactile stimulation in the framework of a mislocalization test. Additionally, tactile stimulation was performed in the MRI scanner in order to determine the cortical organization of the possibly affected primary somatosensory cortex. The patient was able to detect electrotactile stimulation in 4 of the 5 fingertips (D1, D2, D4, D5), and in the middle phalanx in D3 indicating some innervation. The detection and discomfort threshold were considerably higher at the affected side than at the intact side, with higher detection and discomfort thresholds for the affected side. The discrimination accuracy was rather low at the affected side, with stimulation of D1/D2/D3/D4/D5 eliciting most commonly a sensation at D4/D1/D3/D2/D5, respectively. The neuroimaging data showed a mediolateral succession from D2 to D5 to D1 to D4 (no activation was observed for D3). These results indicate a successful regrowth of the peripheral nerve fibers from the axilla to four fingertips. The data suggest that some of the fibers have switched location in the process and there is a beginning of cortical reorganization in the primary somatosensory cortex, possibly resulting from a re-education of the brain due to conflicting information (touch vs. vision).

Indexed as

brachial plexus injurybrain plasticityS1sensory cortexsomatosensory

Identifiers

PMID35281503
PMCPMC8914191
OpenAlexW4214518743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.