ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Using Home-Cage Monitoring to Determine the Impact of Timed Mating on Male Mouse Welfare.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some of our breeding programs include the use of Prm1 male Homozygous mice which are naturally sterile. This removes the need to use vasectomized males to induce pseudopregnancy in female mice. These males can be kept for up to 9 months and are housed with a companion female. During the timed mating period the companion female is replaced with a new female. This procedure can occur at regular intervals causing a significant increase in cage activity; one of our objectives was to determine whether this was as a result of timed mating. We wanted to investigate the disruption caused to mice during the day of the swap and how long it would take for the cage activity to return to pre-replacement baseline levels. We hypothesized that this impact would be reflected as a significant increase in cage activity, which in itself may not be a result of a negative experience but the potential of repeated disruption to their activity pattern should be considered. We used a well-known home-cage monitoring system to assess changes to the activity pattern in cages when a companion female is replaced. Data from our initial study showed that in the 2-h period after the female is replaced there is a significant increase in cage activity compared to the same time frame on the previous day. In the subsequent study, where no cage change occurred, an increase in activity was also observed when females were replaced; this returned to baseline after approximately 4 h. Prolonged activity during the rest period of mice (over 2 h) could lead to them being fatigued during their active period; therefore, as a refinement we propose that timed matings be performed later in the day, at a time when the animals are active.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.