Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35281419›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2022

Construction of pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training program for patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Zheng-Zheng Ma, Hong-Bing Zhang, Mei-E Niu, Yan-Hong Ding, Yan Zhou, Qi Yang, Jia-Li Wang, Xiao-Wen Zhu, Chun-Ya Qian, Min Su

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zheng-Zheng Ma *Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Hong-Bing Zhang *Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Mei-E NiuDepartment of Nursing, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yan-Hong DingDepartment of Urology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Yan ZhouDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Qi YangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jia-Li WangDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiao-Wen ZhuDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Chun-Ya QianDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Min SuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dushu Lake Hospital affiliated of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Soochow University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNSuzhou Municipal Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is the standard treatment for early localized PCa, of which urinary incontinence is the most common postoperative complication. Pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training is recognized as the first line of intervention measures, but the existing rehabilitation training programs are not clear in the formulation process, the content is not unified, and the clinical operability is not strong. In order to better guide clinical pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training after LRP and prevent and control urinary incontinence, this study constructed a pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training program for LRP patients. Methods: Literature analysis, qualitative interview, and an expert group meeting method were used to form the draft of pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training program for LRP patients. On this basis, after 2 rounds of Delphi expert consultation, the research team modified and improved the program. Results: The consultation experts involved in the 2 rounds were the same, 15 questionnaires were sent out, and 15 were recovered with an effective recovery of 100%. The expert authority coefficient was 0.87. In the second round of consultation, Kendall's harmony coefficient was 0.14 (P<0.001), the mean coefficient of variation of expert opinion was 0.07 (P<0.001), and the mean value of importance assigned to each item was 4.53-5.00 points. Finally, the pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training program for LRR patients was formed. Including rehabilitation training evaluation, rehabilitation training advanced time and content, rehabilitation training form of three first-level indicators, 12 second-level indicators, 53 third-level indicators. Conclusions: The pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training program for LRP patients developed in this study is scientific, reliable, safe and feasible, which can provide reference for clinical pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training after LRP and prevention and control of urinary incontinence.

Indexed as

laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP)nursingpelvic floor muscle rehabilitationprogramProstate cancer (PCa)

Identifiers

PMID35281419
PMCPMC8904947
OpenAlexW4213345314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.