Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35281234›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

An Artificial Neural Network Model for Pediatric Mortality Prediction in Two Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Units in South Africa. A Development Study.

Michael A Pienaar, Joseph B Sempa, Nicolaas Luwes, Lincoln J Solomon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mortality risk prediction models: Methods of assessing discrimination and calibration and what they mean.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A PienaarPaediatric Critical Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Joseph B SempaDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Nicolaas LuwesDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Lincoln J SolomonPaediatric Critical Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
University of the Free State · ZACentral University of Technology · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The performance of mortality prediction models remain a challenge in lower- and middle-income countries. We developed an artificial neural network (ANN) model for the prediction of mortality in two tertiary pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in South Africa using free to download and use software and commercially available computers. These models were compared to a logistic regression model and a recalibrated version of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3. Design: This study used data from a retrospective cohort study to develop an artificial neural model and logistic regression model for mortality prediction. The outcome evaluated was death in PICU. Setting: Two tertiary PICUs in South Africa. Patients: 2,089 patients up to the age of 13 completed years were included in the study. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The AUROC was higher for the ANN (0.89) than for the logistic regression model (LR) (0.87) and the recalibrated PIM3 model (0.86). The precision recall curve however favors the ANN over logistic regression and recalibrated PIM3 (AUPRC = 0.6 vs. 0.53 and 0.58, respectively. The slope of the calibration curve was 1.12 for the ANN model (intercept 0.01), 1.09 for the logistic regression model (intercept 0.05) and 1.02 (intercept 0.01) for the recalibrated version of PIM3. The calibration curve was however closer to the diagonal for the ANN model. Conclusions: Artificial neural network models are a feasible method for mortality prediction in lower- and middle-income countries but significant challenges exist. There is a need to conduct research directed toward the acquisition of large, complex data sets, the integration of documented clinical care into clinical research and the promotion of the development of electronic health record systems in lower and middle income settings.

Indexed as

artificial neural networkchildrencritical caremachine learningseverity of illness

Identifiers

PMID35281234
PMCPMC8916561
OpenAlexW4214495880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.