Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35281197›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Financial Market Sentiment Prediction Technology and Application Based on Deep Learning Model.

Yixuan Guo

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Scalable Fuzzy Inference-Based Ensemble Method for Sentiment Analysis.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yixuan GuoDepartment of Business Administration, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai 201209, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7733-2754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the real world, there are a variety of situations that require strategy control, that is reinforcement learning, as a method for studying the decision-making and behavioral strategies of intelligence. It has received a lot of research and empirical evidence on its functions and roles and is also a method recognized by scholars. Among them, combining reinforcement learning with sentiment analysis is an important theoretical research direction, but so far there is still relatively little research work about it, and it still has the problems of poor application effect and low accuracy rate. Therefore, in this study, we use the features related to sentiment analysis and deep reinforcement learning and use various algorithms for optimization to deal with the above problems. In this study, a sentiment analysis method incorporating knowledge graphs is designed using the characteristics of the stock trading market. A deep reinforcement learning investment trading strategy algorithm for sentiment analysis combined with knowledge graphs from this study is used in the subsequent experiments. The deep reinforcement learning system combining sentiment analysis and knowledge graph implemented in this study not only analyzes the algorithm from the theoretical aspect but also simulates data from the stock exchange market for experimental comparison and analysis. The experimental results illustrate that the deep reinforcement learning algorithm combining sentiment analysis and knowledge graphs used in this study can achieve better gains than the existing traditional reinforcement learning algorithms and has better practical application value.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsAttitudeReinforcement, PsychologyTechnology

Identifiers

PMID35281197
PMCPMC8916864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.